Questions participants each other, in the service “Yahoo! Answers” to answer, from the questioner “to the natural world that is weak not survive, the human society to protect the weak in such tax than not makes sense anyway?” to the questions impact, we will introduce Since answer some respondents were Mai has become a hot topic in a very interesting and net.

※ original quoted directly

Question

It will kill the weak. It is unscrupulous question, but I think if you can answer because wondered …

It will kill the weak.
It is unscrupulous question, but I think that you answer because wondered.
The word law of the jungle as in nature, the weak who are prey to strong person.
Why is the human society but I think of it is not performed?
When I civilization is opened, it is performed conflict between tribes, weak who went killed.
But, in today’s society because it’s such of it tax the weak, and taking advantage of offers.
Do not the law of nature that the superior genes survive.
Now of human society I think than not makes sense.
And put out the story, such as human rights this time I think that you refrain.

Chosen responded to best answer

And it’s painting – Innovation ,,, well it is misunderstanding, but the natural world is not a “law of the jungle”
It’s not necessarily to be eaten and just because weak, it does not necessarily also Kueru to say because strong and
Tiger is strong without hyperbole than rabbits, but rabbits and prosperity in the world, the tiger is on the verge of extinction
***
Law of nature, is at an individual level in the “all meat all food”, it is at the species level, “survival of the fittest”
In the individual level, finally all individuals Masu “leaching”
all individuals, to varying somewhat of life and death always
the difference of life between individuals, there is no sense if you look at the natural world the entire
dog there but to live two years, even as another dog lived 10 years, it is almost much of a difference is not, it is a good thing Which even
This is the “survival of the fittest” is at the species level
, but this word has spread and been misunderstood, never is not the meaning of the “law of the jungle”
rather than remain a “strong person”, it’s a “suitable person” remains
(the “remain” the sense that, note that the meaning of not means “individuals survive,” “gene is passed on to the next generation”)
And features of the things of nature is that “there is a way of environmental adaptation of more good to say infinite”
It not necessarily limited to active ones remain, there is also a survival strategy that has dropped extremely metabolism as sloth and deep-sea organisms
prolific ones small production ones, fast ones the slow ones, strong ones weak ones, small ones large thing ,,,,
as that of all forms of organisms are present know
As long and “adaptive”, I but no relationship intends but intends Yowakaro Tsuyokaro
And the meaning of “survival of the fittest” is not the meaning of “individuals survive,” “gene is passed on to the next generation” over the meaning of, a particular individual is do but are not related helpless but it will leach into predators It is
And individuals who were not born only one animal the child to survive 10 years, in the did not live only one year child and 10 animals gave birth individual, it will be the latter was “survival” as a more “fittest”
Is a “survival” and “to leave the offspring”, or it is some of the countless possible way is “adaptation”, How you “adaptation” will be the fact that as soon as the survival strategy of the organism
Human survival strategy ,,,, “social”
To make a highly functional society, the mutual aid to protect the individual to have the action
individual long-term survival is impossible to individuals (= that is, question the main san you say “weak” is) also the fact that someone survived, It is a strategy that ,,,, to maximize the potential of the offspring of prosperity
How many individuals survive, whether can take advantage of the “underdog” of how much, is proportional to the power of the social
humanity be to develop a civilization, we were not able to take advantage of in the previous era It is now possible to take advantage of some individuals
As a survival strategy of the organism it would be great success
(the organism is what is a intrinsic increase the offspring, it even question the value of the thing itself is meaningless. “whether there is a need to increase the so few?” question does not make sense as long as it discussed by standing in nature that)
It’s not what I “excellent gene”
“in a particular environment that is, a gene that might be effective” there is
Is what kind of “transformation” that is expressed by the gene, or favor for survival in what environment is impossible to calculate
, for example, traits that are not only considered a “disorder” also for modern society of mankind, the future to “effective traits” It might have been
so, “failure (is = After all phenotypic irregular but)” in many patterns as much as possible if it is possible to those who keep suffer from, I become “insurance” on the survival strategy
(“It born eyes are not visible, whether? Is advantageous in what circumstances,” Please do not ask questions that. That’s what you do things you can not read anyone. Nature and is a myriad of possibilities of mass , Because it is not possible to untimely God man of partition compute all)
I do not have the modern people to survive by being left alone in the Amazon jungle
that is, if you are placed in the natural state of the absence of raw thing called “society”, the human is that it’s all “weak”
The gathering “weak” we, and was then to take advantage of the “weak” as much of the can and I’m a man of the survival strategy
So in the social sciences, “struggle” also “collaboration” also but the components of the human society, which is more Speaking of whether the essence of “human society”, “collaboration”, you answer do with the
“struggle” is how activation Shoga, last man if you do not “cooperate” because not survive
Is all of us is “weak”, it is that it is the survival strategy of Homo sapiens that take advantage of the “weak”

From the user who looked at this answer, the voice of praise, such as “I was very becoming to study”, “” survival of the fittest “or I see …” and “plainly convinced went!” Was lifted. This question, but answer itself is a thing of 2011, it is incredible and also a hot topic after a few years.